01:35:16 14 July 2014 |
|
burger
Senior Resident
On forum: 12/01/2008
 Message edited by: burger 07/14/2014 1:35:49
Messages: 1355
|
---QUOTATION---
Also, who is Ivancov? Voronin tells me I should go see him to get a good shooter but there is no mission. ---END QUOTATION---
I think hes on a roof in the bar area. There's someone on a roof (colonel inancov ?)that repairs weapons and stuff in the bar area after you talk to them. |
01:35:36 14 July 2014 |
|
Steelyglint
Senior Resident
On forum: 06/06/2009
Messages: 5171
|
---QUOTATION--- @Steelyglint:
This is somehow getting a little bit...uhm...LOL?
You have to kill soldiers but why? They only do what their goverment wants them to do and they don't have any chance to change that. So this is really not ok. Why do you kill the dogs in game? They are not responsible for that what happend to them and if you were one of them you really would like some humen flesh...got it? ---END QUOTATION---
Completely. But if the soldiers are shooting at you, and the only way to make them stop is by shooting back, that's what you do. They decided to make an enemy of you - it wasn't your decision. And even though they are under orders, they still have the option to refuse those orders if they consider them wrong. It will, of course, mean a court martial and time in the glasshouse, but that is a result of a military/government with no ethics or humanity.
Seems none of the soldiers in the Zone (save one in Agroprom in vanilla SoC) has the courage of his convictions. They are all 'bulletheads' who have no minds of their own, or no morality, which just means they'd probably be criminals if they were civilians. Criminals are those in society who have a serious lack of morals and ethics, after all.
As to dogs, that's a bit silly. Unless you are suicidal and enjoy vast pain, you are not going to let a dog chew on you because it might be hungry. You shoot the things to prevent that. Same goes for any mutant.
.
A preoccupation with the next world is a clear indication of an inability to cope credibly with this one.
.
|
|