ProjectsWhat's NewDownloadsCommunitySupportCompany
Post message
 
Forum Index » GSC General Forum » Offtopic
Theme: The End of Offtopic
 
Required fields are marked by an asterisk.
 
Your name*
Header
Message*
IMPORTANT: if you are using a browser that does not support cookies, we can't store some default preferences on your browser for you. Otherwise, you will have to type your username and password once per browser session.
:) or :-) :D or :-D ;) or ;-) :-P or :P (Y) or (y) (L) or (l) :| or :-|
:( or :-( :E or :-E :-/ :\ or :-\ (N) or (n) (U) or (u) :O or :-O
:M or :-M                        
SubmitBack
 
Messages that are near...
Posted by/on
Question/Answer 
  18:10:21  18 August 2010
profilee-mailTo the Top
MariusLecter
Senior Resident
 

 
On forum: 10/17/2008

---QUOTATION---

(Does being potty trained make an individual less free?)
---END QUOTATION---



It forces the construct of 'training' to their 'potty'.
Potty should be free.
Free as a bird.
You can't cage a free bird, man.
  20:11:47  18 August 2010
profilee-mailTo the Top
lowduck
(Senior)
 
On forum: 10/31/2009
Would I be violating the new offtopic rules about "posting another users personal information without consent" if I ventured to correct a certain misinformed assumption of Marius Lecter about Hhiker?...This talk about tightening the rules is making me a bit nervous...
  20:51:56  18 August 2010
profilee-mailTo the Top
BobBQ
2007-2017
 

 
On forum: 07/30/2007

---QUOTATION---
How can you ban someone, just because you desire to do so?
---END QUOTATION---


Commissar Fuklaw permits no heresy!
  20:55:43  18 August 2010
profilee-mailTo the Top
Kane4
"Order of the Liquidators" and Dez0wave Tester
 

 
On forum: 07/17/2008

---QUOTATION---
How can you ban someone, just because you desire to do so?
Commissar Fuklaw permits no heresy!
---END QUOTATION---



Lol, where did that come from?
  21:31:02  18 August 2010
profilee-mailTo the Top
Genocider
Caretaker of the infamous Pseudo duck
 

 
On forum: 03/20/2010
Ah this topic is so misleading
  21:46:23  18 August 2010
profilee-mailTo the Top
Kane4
"Order of the Liquidators" and Dez0wave Tester
 

 
On forum: 07/17/2008
 

Message edited by:
Kane4
08/18/2010 21:46:35

---QUOTATION---
I hope that Kronotaur gets back
---END QUOTATION---



All kneel before Halo, for it's the best. Stalker should definitely look like Halo.
  02:05:03  19 August 2010
profilee-mailTo the Top
llama man
Llamanized metalheadstalker
 

 
On forum: 04/29/2008

---QUOTATION---
I hope that Kronotaur gets back
---END QUOTATION---



I read some of that guys posts in the archive i think... Largely amusing.
  10:21:57  19 August 2010
profilee-mailTo the Top
hhiker
off to new worlds
 

 
On forum: 10/31/2008

---QUOTATION---
Would I be violating the new offtopic rules about "posting another users personal information without consent" if I ventured to correct a certain misinformed assumption of Marius Lecter about Hhiker?...This talk about tightening the rules is making me a bit nervous...
---END QUOTATION---



Hypothetically:
if it was information that i had not already posted all around myself (which in this case i have) then i would ask in return: why would you rather not let me (or anyone for that matter, if it was their personal details) correct the assumption if i so choose?
Or - why would you be so reluctant to ask the other person "is it OK to share this?"

I personally find it rather unfair if somone, say, has remembered or acquired a bit of information about someone else ("I know what your name is!" I know where you live!" etc.) and goes around spreading it to everyone as some great oracle or in-circle buddy without considering - or asking - if that person whishes this information to be shared. (Think of the excited parent telling the visitors all about your teenage self for example. Charming, isn't it?)

It would be (in my eyes) a different matter, though, if it was referring/linking to the information someone has indeed previously posted in the forum.


Btw.
Just because the expectations/boundaries are spelled out doesn't make them tighter. It just makes them known and clearer. (I personally insisted the points of "ask before you share someone else's information" and "let everyone speak for themselves" to be incorporated to the "Offtopic amendment".)
  10:53:23  19 August 2010
profilee-mailTo the Top
lowduck
(Senior)
 
On forum: 10/31/2009
Point made. As long as I didn't upset you, no malice intended. Sun is shinning...great day.

 

Copyright © 1995-2019 GSC Game World. All rights reserved.
This site is best viewed in Internet Explorer 4.xx and up and Javascript enabled. Webmaster.
Opera Software products are not supported.
If any problem concerning the site functioning under Opera Software appears apply
to Opera Software technical support service.